Legal Opinion

Frenzel v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1997No. 96-141PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Appellant, Paul A. Frenzel, appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Frenzel was convicted of seven counts of first degree sexual assault in violation of W.S. 6-2-302(a)(i) and was sentenced to a term of not less than seven nor more than ten years on each count, with the sentences to run consecutively. He contends that, although he was convicted of seven separate sexual assaults against his daughter, all the convictions arose out of a single criminal transaction. As a result, argues Frenzel, the imposition of consecutive rather…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Baum v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Cook v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Frenzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Padilla v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. DeLoge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McDaniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Strickland v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API