Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. Ball
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 13, 1972No. 72-1016PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
Appellants, Armour and Company, Wilson & Co., Inc., and Geo. A. Hormel & Company, all Delaware corporations, manufacture a variety of sausage and other meat products. They join in an action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief alleging a conflict of the Federal Wholesome Meat Act (Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1907, as amended), 21 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1967) with the Michigan Comminuted Meat Law (M.S.A. 12.964(1) et seq.; M.C.L.A. § 289.581 et seq.) (1952). The two laws will sometimes be designated the Federal Act and the Michigan Law. Appellees are the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Zalman v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Joseph Despain, Cross-Appellants v. Marlin Johnston, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Zalman v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Mississippi Poultry Association, Inc. v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of the United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Grinnell Corp. v. HackettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.