Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Watts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1922No. 927; No. 928; No. 960; No. 961; No. 962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In these cases, which were suits brought under § 266, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of March 4, 1913, c. 160, 37 Stat. 1013, for a preliminary and permanent injunction, a preliminary injunction was denied by the District Court and a stay granted until an application eóuld be made to this court. As the District Court is *577familiar with the character of the case, and we are not, we deny the motion for a stay, with leave to apply to the District Court for a stay until the matter can be disposed of here, if in its judgment it deem that such a stay should be granted. The motion to advance is…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Liberty Nat. Bank of South Carolina v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Baumann v. SmrhaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1956
  4. Red Star Motor Drivers' Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. United States v. International Salt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API