Legal Opinion
United States v. International Salt Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 20, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment (Federal Rules Civil Procedure, Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; United States v. Associated Press, D.C.S.D. N.Y., 1943, 52 F.Supp. 362, aff’d 326 U.S. 1, 65 S.Ct. 1416, 89 L.Ed. 2013) against the corporate defendant only, on the ground that the pleadings and admissions of the defendant show absence of any genuine issue as to any material fact and that plaintiff is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. No affidavits have been submitted by either party.
This is a civil action brought pursuant to Sec. 4 of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960