Legal Opinion

The Sacramento

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 5, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On exception to the petition by Ohio Transportation Company, as owner of steamer Gladstone and bailee for cargo, and by the underwriters, as well, on such cargo, in respect of petitioner’s allegations for leave to contest liability.

1Opinion of the Court

SEAMAN, District Judge.

These proceedings are instituted by the owner of the Sacramento to limit liability arising out of a collision whereby the steamer Gladstone and her cargo suffered damage, and in the absence of a libel or suit on behalf of the vessel or cargo so damaged. Leave is sought in the petition to contest therein the liability of the Sacramento, or owner, for such loss, and this twofold aspect of the petition is clearly authorized by the admiralty rules (54, 55, 56, and 57) adopted by the Supreme Court to carry out the provisions of the liability limitation act of 1851 (Rev. St.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Norwich Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Providence & New York Steamship Co. v. Hill Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Steamship Co. v. MountSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Ex Parte SlaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colonial Sand & Stone Co. v. MuscelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API