Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Slayton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1882PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Petition for a writ, of prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

We are of 'opinion that, notwithstanding Admiralty Rules Nos. 54, 55, 56, and 57 of this court, the owner of a vessel may institute appropriate proceedings, in a court of competent juris .diction, to obtain the benefit of the limitation of liability provided for by. sects. 4284 and 4285 of the Revised. Statutes, without waiting for a suit to be begun against him or his vessel for the loss out of which the’ liability arises. As was said at this term in The Scotland (supra, p. 24), our rules were not intended to prevent an owner from availing himself of any other remedy or process which the law…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Providence & New York Steamship Co. v. Hill Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. British Transport Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Ex Parte Phenix Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1886

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API