Colonial Sand & Stone Co. v. Muscelli
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The Colonial Sand & Stone Co., Inc., filed a petition to limit its liability under the Fifty-Third Admiralty Rule, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, which Muscelli, the claimant, moved to dismiss because (1.) it failed to set forth “the facts and circumstances by reason of which exemption from liability is claimed”; and (2.) because it did not allege that it had been filed within six months after he had given notice of his claim to the petitioner. The court dismissed the petition upon both grounds, and the petitioner appealed.
The petition alleged the following facts.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steamship Co. v. MountSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- The TraderDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1904
- The SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1904
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bensch v. Estate of UmarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Complaint of Port Arthur Towing Co. on Behalf of M/V Miss CarolynCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Newton v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Newton v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.