Legal Opinion

Gate Guard Services, L.P. v. Thomas Perez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2015No. 14-40585PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

It is often better to acknowledge an obvious mistake than defend it. When the government acknowledges mistakes, it preserves public trust and confidence. It can start to repair the damage done by erroneously, indeed vindictively, attempting to sanction an innocent business. Rather than acknowledge its mistakes, however, the government here chose to defend the indefensible in an indefensible manner. As a result, we impose attorneys’ fees in favor of Gate Guard as a sanction for the government’s bad faith. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b).

At nearly every turn, this Department…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Aguirre v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. JohnJay Portillo v. Gregory CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Delise Adams v. Memorial HermannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Moench v. Marquette Transportation Co. Gulf-Inland, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. Caris MPI v. UnitedHealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API