Clausells v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wole
This case involves the right of a fire insurance company to put into force in Porto Rico what is known as the coinsurance clause. By such clause an insurance company limits or seeks to limit its liability in case of partial loss. Sometimes the. insurance company refuses to assume a full liability for a loss by fire unless the property is insured for 75 or 80 per cent of its value; sometimes, as in the policy before us, the clause in question requires the property holder *111to keep the property fully insured. Under said clause the policy holder in effect would become an insurer jointly with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. West Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Wolf v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- Simon v. Queen Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.