Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, P. J.

This is an action on a contract of fire insurance, the unusual and peculiar nature of which, as well as the circumstances surrounding the controversy, will be hereinafter more fully set forth.

Owing to these matters, the trial court, on motion of defendant and over the objections of plaintiffs, regarded the case as having been converted into equity by the defenses raised, and tried it as an equity case, denying plaintiffs’ right to a jury.

After hearing the case, the chancellor, by his refusal of Declaration E (the only one of plaintiff’s five declarations that was refused), held that…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. ClementsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Cravens v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Thompson v. Traders' InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Wilson Company v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Missouri District Telegraph Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Schimmel Fur Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Rosedale Securities Co. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Newcomer v. Standard Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1958
  5. Allen v. Fidelity-Phenix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API