Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 25, 2021No. 1:12-cv-01436Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JOANNA MCCOY, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. ELH-12-1436 BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This product liability case concerns an allegedly defective orthopedic device used for hip replacements. Defendants Biomet Orthopedics, LLC; Biomet Manufacturing Corp.; and Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC (collectively, “Biomet”) designed and manufactured metal-on-metal hip implant systems, including the M2a-MagnumTM (the “Magnum” or the “Biomet device”). Plaintiff Joanna McCoy was implanted with the…

2Cases cited126 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API