Legal Opinion
John v. Hoag
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward M. Horey, J.
Central to the motions before the court is the claim of the plaintiff that he was given an exclusive contractual right to sell cigarettes on the lands of the Seneca and that through the interference of the defendants, Hoag, the Seneca Nation and its officers breached the agreement.
The motions before the court are to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint. One motion is brought by the defendant, Seneca Nation of Indians, and by the 19 officers and councilors of the Seneca Nation. A second motion is brought by the defendants, Robert Hoag and his wife Rosalyn…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Alvord & Swift v. Stewart M. Muller Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowen v. DoyleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- Alexander v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009