Legal Opinion

McCullough v. McCullough

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1918No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Assumpsit by Dora D. McCullough against Robert E. McCullough for alimony. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in the Ingham circuit court to recover certain installments of alimony which had accrued on a decree granted her for alimony alone, by the common pleas court of Licking county, Ohio. Upon the trial plaintiff showed the marriage and desertion and made proof of the records of the Licking county court showing an allowance of $100 a month to plaintiff as alimony beginning on March 1, 1913, the same to paid monthly. It was further shown that no part of this allowance had ever been paid and that there was then due thereon the sum of $3,447.73. With this proof the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Levine v. LevineOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Cummings v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Rodda v. RoddaOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Rosa v. RosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API