Legal Opinion
Lindner v. Hill
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided April 25, 1984No. 04-83-00328-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUTTS, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment declaring that Lindner Road is a public road under the doctrine of implied dedication. Plaintiffs Harvey Lindner and his wife Ruth are the present owners of the 1,528 acre ranch through which Lindner Road passes in an east-west direction for a distance of 1.3 miles. During the trial, plaintiffs, Harvey and Ruth, without objection, amended their petition to include their sons, Mark and Steven, as plaintiffs. Defendants are Frank Y. Hill, Jr., county attorney of Kendall County, William R. Whit-worth, Kendall county judge, and members of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Moody v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Houston Natural Gas Corporation v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Wright v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Spinuzzi v. Town of CorinthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lindner v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Stein v. Killough, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- Cox v. Thee Evergreen ChurchTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Betts v. Reed, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Reed v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.