Legal Opinion

Beacham v. Cullens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1942No. 14292PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The question is not whether C. K. Beacham, the Laurens County defendant, was a proper or necessary party to the suit, but rather, did the petition seek substantial equitable relief against him? That he may properly have been made a party does not determine the other inquiry. It is a question as to proper venue, not proper parties. The requirement of the constitution of this State, art. 6, sec. 16, par. 3, is that “Equity cases shall be tried in the county where a defendant resides against whom substantial relief is prayed.” Code, § 2-4303. A non-resident can not be made to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Southern Airlines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Martin v. GaissertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Ellis v. FarmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Grace v. Interstate Bond Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Willie v. WillieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Carlson v. Hall County Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Beacham v. BeachamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Bennett v. Bagwell & Stewart, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. Bennett v. Bagwell & Stewart, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API