Legal Opinion

Bulpitt v. Blatz

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1948No. Civ. No. 16478PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Respondents move to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that it was not taken within the time permitted by rule 3(a), Rules on Appeal (22 Cal.2d 2), and therefore that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the same.

Chronology

I. October 24, 1947, judgment was entered in favor of respondents.

II. October 30, 1947, respondents mailed to appellant’s attorneys, whose offices were in the same city as the offices of respondent’s attorneys, written notice of the entry of judgment.

III. November 7, 1947, notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed in the clerk’s office by appellant.

IV…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. BehrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Tuck v. TuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API