Legal Opinion

St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Silverman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1949No. 12096PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

This is an action by appellee upon a policy of fire insurance issued by appellant to recover for the “total loss” by fire of the building covered by the policy. The appel*863lant denied that the building was a total loss, and pled that proof of loss was not made within ninety-one days as required by the terms of the policy. During the course of the trial, which was to a jury, appellee, under leave of the court, filed a trial amendment in which he pled compliance with the terms of the policy, and in the alternative pled a waiver of compliance and that appellant was estopped to deny…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Royal Insurance Co. v. McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Phoenix Assurance Co. of London v. StobaughTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Republic Insurance v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Republic Ins. Co. v. HaleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  5. Kinney-Shotts Investment Co. v. D. v. Brooks Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paxton v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API