Legal Opinion
Amanda Frlekin v. Apple Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 16, 2017No. 15-17382PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We respectfully ask the Supreme Court of California to exercise its discretion to decide the certified question set forth in Part II of this Order. See Cal. R. Ct. 8.548. The answer to this question of California law would be dispositive of the appeal before üs, and no clear controlling California precedent exists. Id. Moreover, because the question that we certify is of extreme importance to numerous employees and employers in California, considerations of comity and .federalism suggest that the court of last resort in California, rather than our court, should have the opportunity to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. BuskSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Joseluis Alcantar v. Hobart ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Maria Vega, Eva Trevino, on Behalf of Herself and as Next Friend of Pedro Trevino v. John W. GasperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Overton v. Walt Disney Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- George Huerta v. Csi Elec. Contractors, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Amanda Frlekin v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Oliver v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020