Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Headrick

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1896No. 7518PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.

This proceeding originated before a justice of the peace for Lancaster county, where defendant in error claimed the .sum of $20, the value of certain live stock killed through alleged negligence in the management of an engine upon plaintiff in error’s line of road in said *287county. There was a jury trial, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff therein, from which an appeal was by the defendant below taken to the district court, where, upon the motion of the former, the appeal was dismissed and which is the ruling now assigned as error.

It was held in Moise v. Powell, 40 Neb., 671,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . TrezzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. State ex rel. McGraw v. EnsignNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Moise v. PowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. GorackeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heckman v. MarchioNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Dawson County Irrigation Co. v. McMullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Schmidt v. BoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Weiner v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API