Legal Opinion
In Re Ivan F. Boesky Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 1, 1993No. MDL No. 732 M21-45-MP. No. 90 Civ. 2472 (MP)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge:
BRIEFLY
The defendant, Goldman Sachs, has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. and a hearing thereon was held of plaintiff FMC’s evidence in response and in attempted support of its claims.
Defendant, an investment banker, was retained by plaintiff, FMC, in 1986 on a contingent fee arrangement to study and handle a plan to restructure the interests of its three groups of shareholders, viz., the public shareholders, the management shareholders, and the employee Thrift Plan shareholder. The plan was to distribute new shares to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In Re Northern Telecom Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Securities & Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- RAYMOND WEIL, SA v. TheronDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Ivan F. Boesky Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.