Legal Opinion
Commercial Banking Corp. v. Miller (In Re Miller)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 27, 1988No. 17-12508PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtor and Defendant in this adversary proceeding, MARION THERESA MILLER (hereinafter referred to as “the Debtor”), takes up the suggestion that we offered to a very different debtor in In re Telephonics, Inc., 85 B.R. 312, 318 n. 3 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1988), to remove a state court proceeding in which a debtor was in the process of attacking a judgment entered therein to this court if the debtor wishes us to question the validity of the judgment. Applying the equitable principles in favor of allowing parties to defend causes on their merits which…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Emcasco Insurance Company v. Louis SambrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Garafano v. Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund (In Re Garafano)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Rowe v. Conners (In Re Rowe)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Smith v. Kissell Co. (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. SpivakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.