Legal Opinion
Smith v. Kissell Co. (In Re Smith)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 1, 1988No. 19-11537PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The instant adversary proceeding involves an Objection filed by PATRICIA SMITH, the Debtor-mortgagor (hereinafter referred to as “the Debtor”), to a Proof of Claim filed by the Defendant, her mortgagee, THE KISSELL COMPANY (hereinafter “the Mortgagee”). We follow our own recent previous decisions in disallowing that portion of the claim seeking postTjudgment interest at the contract rate and permitting the Debtor to recoup a penalty for violations of the federal Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In the Matter of Benny L. ROACH and Edith Roach, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Albert E. Thomka v. A. Z. Chevrolet, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- New York Guardian Mortgage Corp. v. DietzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Richard Gennuso v. Commercial Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Russell v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re KleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Soto v. PNC Bank (In Re Soto)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- In Re RorieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Galloway v. Long Beach Mortgage Co. (In Re Galloway)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Cole v. Cenlar Federal Savings Bank (In Re Cole)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.