Legal Opinion
Victor Zarvela v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 26, 2001No. Docket 99-2757PublishedCited by 267 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The basic issue on this appeal concerns the timeliness of a habeas corpus petition. The more precise issues are (1) whether a district court confronted with a so-called “mixed petition” containing exhausted and unexhausted claims should dismiss the petition without prejudice to renewal after exhaustion, or stay further proceedings, and (2) if a stay is entered, whether the stay should be conditioned on prompt initiation of state court exhaustion and prompt return to federal court at the completion of exhaustion. These issues arise on an appeal by Victor Zarvela…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by267 opinions
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- David Palmer v. Howard Carlton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Sandra Maxwell Griffin v. Shirley A. Rogers, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Aparicio v. ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.