Duke v. Meisky
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
In the record on appeal appellants have grouped three exceptions under the heading “Assignment of Error No. 1,” twenty-six exceptions under the heading “Assignment of Error No. 2,” and nine exceptions under the heading “Assignment of Error No. 3.” While all of these relate to rulings admitting or excluding evidence, in the case of each grouping several distinct and different questions of law are presented. This method of grouping exceptions does not conform with the Rules of Practice in this Court. Rule 19(c) provides that all exceptions relied on shall be grouped and separately…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Wagoner v. ButcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Pompey v. HyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- First Northwestern Trust Co. of South Dakota v. SchnableSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- First Northwestern Trust Co. of South Dakota v. SchnableSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Riggs v. R. G. Foster & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975