Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel G. Chapel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1995No. 93-30236PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

We granted en banc review of this case to consider whether to overrule our decision in United States v. Harvey, 701 F.2d 800, 803-04 (9th Cir.1983), which held that the Fourth Amendment requires that authorities arrest a suspect prior to a non-eonsen-sual taking of a sample of the suspect s blood without a warrant. In the case we review, a three-judge panel reversed Daniel Chapel’s conviction for drunken driving in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(2), after concluding that park rangers violated his Fourth Amendment rights when they seized a blood sample later used in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Mary Mae Harvey, United States of America v. Wallace ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Phillip BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Ove v. GwinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Rise v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. EngesserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API