United States v. Daniel G. Chapel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
We granted en banc review of this case to consider whether to overrule our decision in United States v. Harvey, 701 F.2d 800, 803-04 (9th Cir.1983), which held that the Fourth Amendment requires that authorities arrest a suspect prior to a non-eonsen-sual taking of a sample of the suspect s blood without a warrant. In the case we review, a three-judge panel reversed Daniel Chapel’s conviction for drunken driving in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(2), after concluding that park rangers violated his Fourth Amendment rights when they seized a blood sample later used in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Mary Mae Harvey, United States of America v. Wallace ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Phillip BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Ove v. GwinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Rise v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. EngesserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.