Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillip Berry

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1989No. 88-5542PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

Defendant, Phillip Berry, was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol while driving on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Tennessee. He claims that blood test results obtained at the direction of a federal park officer while he was unconscious should have been excluded from evidence because applicable state law would exclude this evidence. Alternatively, he argues that the evidence was obtained in violation of the fourth amendment. The magistrate and district court rejected both arguments. We affirm.

Berry was convicted of operating a motor vehicle on federal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. Mary Mae Harvey, United States of America v. Wallace ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. EngesserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States v. Daniel G. ChapelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. EntrekinHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. McNeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API