Legal Opinion
Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 31, 2013No. 2012-1355PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
In this patent infringement case, Plantronics, Inc. (“Plantronics”) filed suit alleging that Aliph, Inc. and Aliphcom, Inc.’s (collectively, “Aliph”) products infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,712,453, entitled “Concha Headset Stabilizer” (the “'453 patent”). On March 23, 2012, the district court granted-in-part Aliph’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement and invalidity, construing certain disputed terms, finding in relevant part that the accused products do not infringe claims 1 and 10, and holding the asserted claims invalid as obvious. Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- In Re: Van OsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Intercontinental Great Brands v. Kellogg North America CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Cadence Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.