Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Reed Bros. & Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChittenden, J.

This is an action brought in the Superior Court of Cincinnati by John H. Coleman, as plaintiff, against the defendant to recover damages for alleged malicious prosecution of plaintiff. The plaintiff alleges in his petition that on or about the 13th day of October, 1919, an authorized agent of the defendant, falsely and maliciously, and without reasonable or probable cause, filed an affidavit with the clerk of the municipal court of the city of Cincinnati, charging the plaintiff with having committed the crime of larceny, and caused a warrant to issue thereon, by virtue of which the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. MastellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Adams v. LisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
  3. Bruley v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Whitehurst v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. William Sessoms v. The Union Savings & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API