Legal Opinion

Furtick v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 2003No. 25581PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

The South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services (“DPPPS”) argues that the circuit court erred in holding that the Administrative Law Judge Division (“ALJD”) has jurisdiction to review the final decision of the DPPPS in this case.

Factual/Procedural Background

Respondent, James Furtick, was indicted for burglary in the second degree and grand larceny on June 30, 1994 for crimes committed in September 1992. Respondent was convicted as charged and sentenced to fifteen years for burglary in the second degree and three years for grand larceny, to run…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. DabneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thomas Torrence v. Scott LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  2. Sullivan v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Woodson v. DLI Properties, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Furtick v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Davis v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API