Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Miller Brewing Company
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 22, 1969No. 65-C-272, 67-C-101PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, District Judge:
The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and back pay because of alleged sex discrimination in employment practices. The action is brought under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“§ 201”) and in particular the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d). 1
The women plaintiffs were employed as laboratory technicians at the Miller Brewing Company (“Miller”). (Hereafter in this opinion, women and men laboratory technicians are referred to as “women and men.”) Miller is a Wisconsin corporation with an office and plant in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Park v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
- Wirtz v. Basic IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1966
- Burke v. Mesta MacH. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Spring v. Washington Glass CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Giannini v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1955
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hodgson v. Miller Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. American Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and Cross-Appellant v. Square D Company, a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Hays v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- L & F DISTRIBUTORS v. Cruz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.