Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. Enterprise Engineering & Construction Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 1, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This matter arises under the Miller Act (40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a-270c). The complaint alleges that pursuant to a contract for certain public work to be done by Enterprise Engineering and Construction Company at the Dover Air Force Base the said Company entered into a, so-called, payment bond, with Standard Accident Insurance Company as -surety, to insüre payment of claims for labor or materials in the prosecution of the work. The complaint alleges that M. A. Hart-nett, Inc. furnished material for use in the performance of the contract and has not been paid. One of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. BoomerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- United States Ex Rel. Berkowitz v. Frankini Construction Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jiménez y Salellas, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
- United States v. Southern Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1964
- United States ex rel. Wrecking Corp. v. Edward R. Marden Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
- Jiménez y Salellas, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965