Legal Opinion

Warren Petroleum Corp. v. Helms

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1952No. 35269PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, Ray Helms, against Warren Petroleum Corporation to recover damages to plaintiff’s livestock alleged to be the result of their drinking crude oil deposited on the land leased for agricultural purposes by plaintiff, it being alleged that the crude oil was blown from a drip in defendant’s pipe line and permitted to remain on the land where plaintiff’s cattle had access to it, and that they drank it and were thereby injured. Defendant answered by general denial, admitted that the pipe line belonged to them, alleged that the livestock did not drink the oil and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. CarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Peters Petroleum Corp. v. AlredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Gulf Refining Co. v. CarruthersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cleary Petroleum, Inc. v. CopenhaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API