Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hamm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Chaffee County Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott

This action was commenced by John W. Hamm, as plaintiff, against William S. Jackson, as receiver of the Denver & Rio Grande Railway Company, before a justice of the peace, to recover a certain sum of money due to *59one E. D. Lynch, an employe of said railway company, for services. Lynch had assigned his claim to plaintiff, as follows: “Salida, Colo., February 27, 18SG. J. W. Gilluly, Esq., Cashier D. & R. G. R’y Co., Denver, Colo.: Please pay, or cause to be paid, to John W. Hamm, the sum of seventy-five dollars and fifty cents, the amount due to me by said railroad company for services; and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowland v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1804
  2. Morris v. CheneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Reeve v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Smith v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Moore v. GravelotAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Best v. Rocky Mountain National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. Moulton v. McLeanColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Bardwell v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API