Jackson v. Hamm
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Chaffee County Court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott
This action was commenced by John W. Hamm, as plaintiff, against William S. Jackson, as receiver of the Denver & Rio Grande Railway Company, before a justice of the peace, to recover a certain sum of money due to *59one E. D. Lynch, an employe of said railway company, for services. Lynch had assigned his claim to plaintiff, as follows: “Salida, Colo., February 27, 18SG. J. W. Gilluly, Esq., Cashier D. & R. G. R’y Co., Denver, Colo.: Please pay, or cause to be paid, to John W. Hamm, the sum of seventy-five dollars and fifty cents, the amount due to me by said railroad company for services; and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rowland v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1804
- Morris v. CheneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Reeve v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Smith v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Moore v. GravelotAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Best v. Rocky Mountain National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Moulton v. McLeanColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bardwell v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.