In re R.H.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt
The natural parents of R.H., a youth in need of care, appeal from an order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, terminating their parental rights. We affirm.
The following issues are raised on appeal:
1. Did the District Court err in finding that the court-ordered treatment plan was appropriate?
2. Was the court-ordered treatment plan ambiguous so as to deny the parents due process?
The natural parents had four children: L.H., J.H., R.H., and V.H. The oldest child, L.H., began to live with her paternal grandmother in the mid-1970s. In 1975, the second child, J.H., was placed in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lorash v. EpsteinMontana Supreme Court · 1989
- In re L.W.K.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
- In re J.N.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re JNMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Matter of Custody and Parental Riaghts of MmMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- In re A.K.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.