Legal Opinion

In re R.H.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1991No. 90-354PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

The natural parents of R.H., a youth in need of care, appeal from an order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, terminating their parental rights. We affirm.

The following issues are raised on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in finding that the court-ordered treatment plan was appropriate?

2. Was the court-ordered treatment plan ambiguous so as to deny the parents due process?

The natural parents had four children: L.H., J.H., R.H., and V.H. The oldest child, L.H., began to live with her paternal grandmother in the mid-1970s. In 1975, the second child, J.H., was placed in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Lorash v. EpsteinMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In re L.W.K.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re J.N.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re JNMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Matter of Custody and Parental Riaghts of MmMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In re A.K.Montana Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API