Legal Opinion

In re A.N.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2000No. 99-071PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

¶1 Eric Nichols (Eric) and Diana Nichols (Diana) appeal from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone Comity, terminating their *239parental rights to A.N. and C.N. and awarding permanent legal custody with the right to consent to adoption to the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS). We affirm.

¶2 Eric raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court commit reversible error in determining that Eric’s third treatment plan was appropriate?

¶4 2. Is the District Court’s finding of fact…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re J.N.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re JNMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re R.B.Montana Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re D.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re T.E.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re D.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Christofferson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API