Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2004No. 03-10644PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Corey Mitchell appeals the application of a sentencing enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(3)(C), following his conviction of bank robbery and using and carrying a firearm in relation to that crime. The district court imposed a six-level enhancement because a customer who was in the bank during the robbery-suffered a permanently debilitating stroke that was caused by the acts of Mitchell and his associates in the course of the robbery. Mitchell claims that this injury was not a reasonably foreseeable result of the crime and that therefore the sentencing enhancement should not apply.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CarbajalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Jose P. MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Jermeka Voya HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Albert L. BoudreauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Jose Andaverde-TinocoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API