Legal Opinion
United States v. Castillo
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 22, 2004No. 03-20867PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
The non-foreclosed issue at hand is presented by the Government’s cross-appeal: whether the district court erred when, in sentencing Jose Adrian Castillo, it departed downward on the basis of Castillo’s cultural assimilation. Because the Government’s appellate issues were not preserved in district court, we apply the plain error standard of review, rather than the standard set by the Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to End the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (PROTECT Act), Pub.L. No. 108-21, § 401(d)(2), 117 Stat. 650, 670 (2003) (in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CalverleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Francisco Javier Barajas-NunezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Carlos Saro, United States of America v. Cornelio Cabrera-BaezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. PlanckCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Fernandez-CuscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rojas-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Kurt MixCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. WildCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.