Miranda v. Arizona
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice White, with whom Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart join,
dissenting.
I
The proposition that the privilege against self-incrimination forbids in-custody interrogation without the warnings specified in the majority opinion and without a clear waiver of counsel has no significant support in the history of the privilege or in the language of the Fifth Amendment. As for the English authorities and the common-law history, the privilege, firmly established in the second half of the seventeenth century, was never applied except to prohibit compelled judicial interrogations. The rule…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.