Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miranda v. Arizona

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 13, 1966No. 759Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice White, with whom Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart join,

dissenting.

I

The proposition that the privilege against self-incrimination forbids in-custody interrogation without the warnings specified in the majority opinion and without a clear waiver of counsel has no significant support in the history of the privilege or in the language of the Fifth Amendment. As for the English authorities and the common-law history, the privilege, firmly established in the second half of the seventeenth century, was never applied except to prohibit compelled judicial interrogations. The rule…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API