Scott v. Scott

Defendant appeals from the order of the Wind-ham Superior Court granting plaintiff a divorce on the grounds that she had lived separate and apart from defendant for six consecutive months and that the resumption of marital relations was not reasonably probable. He also appeals the distribution of the marital assets and the award of maintenance to the plaintiff. We reverse.

I

Defendant first contends that the trial court’s finding that “plaintiff and defendant have lived separately and apart from each other in excess of six consecutive months” was not supported by the evidence. In response to…