Legal Opinion

Naumann v. Kurz

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 25, 1989No. 87-169PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

Plaintiff was granted a divorce on March 10, 1987, on the grounds that the parties had lived separate and apart for six consecutive months and resumption of marital relations was not reasonably probable. Defendant wife appeals the decree, alleging that the trial court erred by failing to award maintenance payments to her. We reverse.

The divorce decree issued by the court liquidates most of the couple’s marital property and holds the lion’s share of the liquidated amount in trust for the defendant. The court chose not to award maintenance.

On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. In Re Marriage of LaRocqueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Osborn v. OsbornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  4. Cleverly v. CleverlySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cabot v. CabotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Semprebon v. SemprebonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Delozier v. DelozierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Kohut v. KohutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Gravel v. GravelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API