Legal Opinion

Chilkott v. Chilkott

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 20, 1992No. 90-346PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant husband appeals the property award in this divorce. His principal claim is that the trial court’s valuation of a trust was erroneous because the trust was not subject to the jurisdiction of the court within the meaning of 15 V.S.A. *194§ 751 (equitable distribution of marital property). He also argues that, even if the trust was properly taken into account in distributing the marital assets, the trial court erred in accepting an expert’s opinion as to its value. Finally, husband contends that the uneven distribution of the property was unfair and unreasonable. Because we conclude that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Davidson v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Victor v. VictorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Osborn v. OsbornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Lauricella v. LauricellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Estate of Fleming v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Golden v. Cooper-EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Golden v. Cooper-EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API