Legal Opinion

Medina v. Vander Poel

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 21, 2015No. 1:14-cv-01302 LJOPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: APPEAL

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL; District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is on appeal from an Order of the bankruptcy court granting Appellee William P. Vander Poel’s motion for summary judgment, which held that Appellant Luis Medina’s claims against Appellee sounding in California’s “Private Attorney General Act” (“PAGA”), Cal. Labor Code §§ 2699-2699.3, were discharged under 11 U.S.C. § 727. Appellant’s Opening Brief (“Medina’s Brief’), Doc. 11 at 1.

II. UNDISPUTED FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

According to the complaint filed in the underlying adversary proceeding, Appellant filed a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Bullock v. BankChampaign, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ghadimi v. AshaiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  2. (BK) In Re: Ernesto & Marilyn PatacsilDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Keena, II v. ZhiryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Wood v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Wood v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API