Medina v. Vander Poel
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: APPEAL
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL; District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is on appeal from an Order of the bankruptcy court granting Appellee William P. Vander Poel’s motion for summary judgment, which held that Appellant Luis Medina’s claims against Appellee sounding in California’s “Private Attorney General Act” (“PAGA”), Cal. Labor Code §§ 2699-2699.3, were discharged under 11 U.S.C. § 727. Appellant’s Opening Brief (“Medina’s Brief’), Doc. 11 at 1.
II. UNDISPUTED FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
According to the complaint filed in the underlying adversary proceeding, Appellant filed a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Bullock v. BankChampaign, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ghadimi v. AshaiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- (BK) In Re: Ernesto & Marilyn PatacsilDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Keena, II v. ZhiryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Wood v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Wood v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023