Legal Opinion
(BK) In Re: Ernesto & Marilyn Patacsil
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 16, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01231Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 In Re ERNESTO PATACSIL, et al., District Case No. 2:23-cv-01231-DJC 11 Debtors. Bankr. Case No. 20-23457-A-7 12 JOSEPH CABARDO, et al., Bankr. Adversary Case No. 20-02167-A 13 Appellants, 14 v. ORDER 15 ERNESTO PATACSIL, et al., 16 Appellees. 17 18 19 This appeal asks whether the bankruptcy court in Appellant’s adversary 20 proceeding was correct in holding that only 75% of the California Private Attorneys 21 General Act (“PAGA”) penalties awarded in Appellants’ district court case against 22 Appellees…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.