Legal Opinion

Consolidated Wagon & MacHine Co. v. Kay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1933No. 5250PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRAUP, Chief Justice.

This action was brought to foreclose a chattel mortgage. Judgment went in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal. By the complaint it in substance is alleged that on June 8,1928, the plaintiff by a written contract, for the sum of $1,625, sold and delivered to the defendants Loren Kay and George S. Cooke what modestly was called “goods, wares, and merchandise,” but as shown by a copy of the. contract attached to the complaint, consisted of a secondhand gleaner-thresher for the sum of $1,000, and a Fordson tractor for $625, a total of $1,625, payable $100 in cash,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Advance-Rumely T. Co., Inc. v. JacobsIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Park v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Steele v. BoleyUtah Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lehman v. CoulterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Escamilla v. PingreeUtah Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Bank of Lehi v. WoolseyUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Greer v. GoeslingArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Ralph A. Badger & Co. v. Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Automotive Manufacturers Warehouse, Inc. v. Service Auto Parts, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Butler Bros. Development Co. v. ButlerMontana Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API