Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Commission on Adult Entertainment Establishments of Delaware

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 17, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 85-735 MMSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed for summary judgment on the issues which remain in this case after several years of litigation. At the request of the court, defendants have filed a cross-motion for summary judgment so that all remaining legal issues may be finally resolved. By a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 3, 1991, the court granted plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion in part and held the remainder of the summary judgment motions in abeyance pending supplementation of the record. The summary judgment record has been supplemented. For the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams Outdoor Adver. Ltd. P'ship v. Pa. Dep't of Transp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. 11126 Baltimore Boulevard, Inc. v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1993
  3. Mitchell v. Commission On Adult Entertainment Establishments Of The State Of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Mitchell v. Commission on Adult Entertainment Establishments of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API