Legal Opinion
Pieczenik v. Bayer Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 22, 2012No. 2011-1385PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed with prejudice the complaint filed by Dr. George Pieezenik, on the ground that he failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Dr. Pi-eezenik appeals that dismissal. He also appeals the dismissal of his charge of copyright infringement by the defendants’ quotation from his classroom lecture; he appeals the denial of his request for compulsory mediation; and he appeals Judge Pisano’s denial of the request that Judge Pisano recuse from this case. On review, we…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bobka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Gharb v. Mitsubishi Electric CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Telzrow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Bel Fuse Inc. v. Molex Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Harrison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.