Legal Opinion

Mourik v. Adams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1955No. 33154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Plaintiffs seek by this action to eject defendant from that portion of their city lot now occupied by defendant. Defendant resists the action by claiming title by adverse possession to the property in dispute which she now occupies (herein referred to as the disputed tract).

Prior to September 9, 1941, the east one-half of lot 5, block 3, Osner’s suburban homes, King county, Washing*279ton, then an unimproved tract of land, was owned by Edith Hepburn Van Mourik. On the date mentioned, she caused this parcel to be divided by conveying to Violet Wolfe the north sixty feet thereof which abuts on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peoples Savings Bank v. Frank BuffordWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Skansi v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Brownstin v. BrelleWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rognrust v. SetoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API