Legal Opinion

Brownstin v. Brelle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1938No. 26934. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to lots 5 and 6, in block 14, Lakeview Addition to the city of Seattle. The defendants denied the claim of the plaintiff and, by cross-complaint, to which Florence E. Brownstin, the wife of the plaintiff, was made a party, sought to quiet title to themselves to the property mentioned, subject to the administration of the estate of Rosa B. Brelle, deceased, of whom they were heirs and devisees. The trial to the court without a jury resulted in a decree dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and awarding the defendants the relief which they sought.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tremmel v. MessWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Seymour v. DufurWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Kennedy v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCoy v. LowrieWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Brownstin v. BrelleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mourik v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Brownstin v. BrelleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. McCoy v. LowrieWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API