Legal Opinion

Gustine City v. Silveira

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1944No. Civ. No. 7085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a decree of foreclosure of certain street assessment liens.

The evidence introduced was almost wholly documentary, and in the main undisputed. During the latter part of the year 1920 the respondent, a municipal corporation, initiated proceedings under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730 as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8199). In accordance with the provisions of section 3 thereof, a resolution of intention was adopted by the board of trustees and duly published. A notice of improvement as specified in section 5 of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. McDougald v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Stege v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Beck v. Ransome-Crummey Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Logan v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Mathes v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API