Legal Opinion
United States v. Rockwell International Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 7, 1990No. 87-C-766PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, as relators, David Navarette Sr. and Taxpayers Against Fraud (“TAF”), a non-profit corporation, have commenced this suit under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b) et seq., which, under appropriate circumstances permit private citizens to prosecute civil actions in the name of the United States. Plaintiffs seek damages and civil penalties arising from the defendants’ alleged false statements and claims made in violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”).
Defendants are Rockwell International Corporation (“Rockwell”); Warren…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. HillDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1987
- United States Ex Rel. McCoy v. California Medical Review, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, P.A. v. The Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Taxpayers Against Fraud and Chester L. Walsh v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States ex rel. Milam v. University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Long v. SCS Business & Technical InstituteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States ex rel. Stone v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.